A closet porn starlet, who sides as a contract marriage terminator, is sued for alienation of affection. Sentenced to community service at the ex-wife's church, she rouses the rookie Reverend and all hell breaks loose.
BEAVER DAMNED
I guess we all know that the first ten pages are crucial: they need to gain the confidence of the script-reader in a script-development situation; they need to hook the audience should the piece eventually be filmed and distributed. For these obvious reasons is it essential that they “go” like the proverbial “clockwork” when it comes to establishing plot, character, theme and tone.
This having been said, I think it’s unfair to “pronounce” on anyone’s script if only the first ten pages are available, so I’ll simply record my thoughts, trying to balance out (a) what I think works or has potential against (b) what I think doesn’t work or what I think diminishes that potential as far as anyone can guess at this stage. I’ve added some annotations on the script itself, responding to dialogue, scene action and so forth. So I think I’m going to use this comment section to discuss the concept more generally (though this may mean I have to refer back to annotations from time to time).
To begin with the logline: I think this works potentially and seems to offer the necessary constituent comic elements (e.g. intelligent irreverence in the face of dumb, lumpen indignation). But success obviously lies in the execution.
For instance, how you handle the “legal mechanics” of the sentencing to community service is important; goof your way through this clumsily and you probably consign what follows to feeling more superficial than you plan. The resultant piece might still be funny, and even successful, but it might also lead to a different kind of comedy film to the one you’re envisaging.
Similarly, control of Reymee’s characterization and process of character development is going to be pivotal if this isn’t going to feel like just another lazily lewd comedy. Hopefully, you know where you’re going in relation to character development and which unconscious flaws Reymee is wrestling with as she prosecutes her plot-line with the rookie priest.
On the subject of character, I think your protagonist is immediately “likable”, by which I simply mean that I think the audience could empathize with her and be prepared to follow her on her narrative journey. She’s “damaged”, sure (and I say this not as a result of an automatic assumption about all adult entertainment starlets, but in recognition of that fact that your storyline doesn’t present her circumstances as positive, plus she implies she was abused). But she needs to be, or there’s no story, and this damage sits in engaging counterpoint to her positive qualities: her intelligence, her self-awareness and her winning dark irony.
In this sense, she reminds me a little of the protagonist of Young Adult played by Charlize Theron. Okay, that character’s damage was manifest within much more conventional life situations than the porn industry, but there’s the potential here to portray a similarly punchy, unrepentant and dysfunctionally layered female lead "acting out" in the company of more suburban and straight-laced folk. I guess we also can’t forget thatYoung Adult was written by Diablo Cody whose precision of dialogue and characterization earned her one of those little golden statuettes for Juno.
So, for me, notes on this section of the script need to help you see where possibly you’re not operating with a sufficient level of precision. I’ve pointed out a few moments that I think are worth more of your attention in my annotations: slightly fluffy (excuse the pun) lines of dialogue such as Jimmy Paged’s, and moments where the logic of the situation feels opaque, even if we acknowledge the wisdom of “Show, don’t tell”. For instance,why is her money stored at her father’s? If the script satisfactorily explains this later (will it?), then this could be all to the good. But it still might not explain why she isn’t more angry with her father (a wonderfully gruff character, by the way) or, at least, why she allows him to mollify her so easily (and he might have to work harder on this act of mollification in my opinion, as I’ve mentioned in my annotations).
To continue in this direction, I like the scene in the doctor’s office. Her glance at the diagram of fallopian tubes on the wall was a perfectly pitched moment of deadpan irony (Reymee’s most affecting dramatic gear?), as was her line about counseling women to “embrace their vaginas” and other nuances. But, again, consistent precision is key here when it comes controlling the comic tone of the piece, and I think you need to be careful you don’t fumble certain moments. For instance, I’m not sure the moment the doctor drops the “PAP apparatus” isn’t a little too obvious in a piece that already seems capable of a sharper kind of comedy.
As I’ve mentioned in the annotations, I also think the title is another example of a comic element that’s pulling in the wrong direction. It’s confrontational, which is great, but the punning element on “Beaver” just feels like it can’t escape echoes of a more crudely sluttier kind of comedy (American Pie, Porky’s, Animal House). In the end, I can’t get images out of my head of Priscilla Presley handing Leslie Nielsen a stuffed beaverThe Naked Gun.
So...watch out that more obvious jokes don’t take over, nor that the raw “attitude” of your character supplants tightly controlled character development. Attitude is desperately important, of course, but if the logic of the story doesn’t hang together, attitude probably won’t carry the piece. As Alexander Mackendrick (another comic writer with a little golden statuette) writes: “Comic structure is simply dramatic structure but MORE SO: neater, shorter, faster.” - JS
Rating: Take Another Pass (You're onto something, but it needs more work.)
Jeremy Sheldon (@JeremyRSheldon) has worked for over a decade in film development. He has read scripts for several major production companies and currently works as a writer and script-editor for a number of producers.
Jeremy,
ReplyDeleteI've re-read your comments and annotations a few times and I know I'll re-visit them soon. It is obvious how much time you put into bettering my spec and I appreciate it so much.
I'm happy that you found Reymee likeable, that her father's gruff popped and that you read the potential for a dark, ironic tone. I will work on the execution of it, using your thoughts as guidance. I'd like to think that I was able to pull some of it off in the latter 90 pages and I hope I continued Reymee's intelligence, self-awareness and irony in a controlled manner.
I laughed out loud when you asked how old Reymee is. Interesting that I left that out (stupid, is another word that comes to mind). Also, the point about her dad's allowance is too vague at this point, you're right. I need to make more sense of it. Furthermore, I'll never look at an exclamation point the same way (thanks to you and Mr. McQuarrie)!
Again, thank you for this opportunity and the direction for a re-write that will bring me closer to one of those little statues you speak of.
Sara
Hello everyone, it's my first visit at this web page, and post is really fruitful in support of me, keep up posting such articles.
ReplyDeleteHere is my blog ; win money games online
Hi there, You have done a fantastic job. I'll definitely digg it and personally recommend to my friends. I am confident they'll be benefited from
ReplyDeletethis website.
Here is my website ... play Slots online for Real cash
I'm really enjoying the design and layout of your blog. It's a very
ReplyDeleteeasy on the eyes which makes it much more enjoyable
for me to come here and visit more often. Did you hire out a
developer to create your theme? Great work!
Also visit my blog post ; affiliate marketing guide
What's up, constantly i used to check web site posts here in the early hours in the dawn, because i like to learn more and more.
ReplyDeleteMy site ... super affiliate
It's an remarkable paragraph designed for all the internet people; they will obtain advantage from it I am sure.
ReplyDeleteMy site :: play slots for money online
I drop a comment each time I appreciate a article on a website or if I have something to
ReplyDeleteadd to the conversation. It is triggered by the fire communicated in the
post I browsed. And after this post "BEAVER DAMNED by S. de Waard".
I was actually moved enough to write a leave a responsea response ;) I actually
do have a couple of questions for you if
it's okay. Could it be simply me or does it look like a few of the remarks look like they are coming from brain dead people? :-P And, if you are writing on other online social sites, I'd like to follow you.
Would you make a list the complete urls of your community pages
like your Facebook page, twitter feed, or linkedin profile?
My site - Online Work From home